Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
4.1.1 Type A changes must have the consent of the relevant Programme Lead or Subject Coordinator and be approved by the Faculty Head of Quality Assurance & Validations or Associate Dean Student Experience (ADSE).
Type A changes include:
Regarding sections 5 and 8 of the module descriptor – Module Leaders should, as appropriate, discuss any enhancements to TLA strategies with their PLSEs, DMeLDs, and/or OCSLD link developer.
Regarding Section 10 of the module descriptor - This does not have to be updated regularly as reading lists are made available via Talis Aspire; however, these module bibliographies must be kept current, and any updates should be negotiated with the appropriate Academic Liaison Librarian to ensure additional resources are made available to students.
Where they consider that a requested update constitutes a Type B change, the Faculty Quality Team will refer it back to the Module Leader, who should follow the appropriate approval process as set out in 4.2 below.
4.1.2 Modifications which require submission for approval by the Faculty AESC/QLIC (or authorised sub-group) include changes to:
Type B changes may require some internal or external consultation, as appropriate to the changes being proposed. This may include consultation with students, external examiners, accrediting bodies, or other interested parties. The Faculty link QAO can advise on the level of consultation which should take place.
NOTE: Changes to resource requirements for programme delivery should be dealt with by the Head of Department or Faculty Executive, as appropriate.
4.1.3 Faculties should be mindful of the cumulative effect of a significant number of individual changes to programmes over a period of time; and must ensure that all changes are approved through the appropriate process, and clearly communicated to students, staff and other relevant stakeholders in a timely manner. Re-validation of an existing programme, following the new programme approval process set out in section 3 of this chapter (and in Chapter 5, in the case of collaborative provision), should be initiated where substantial curriculum change is required. This may occur, for example, in the case of:
Advice should be sought from the Faculty link QAO on whether proposed changes constitute a re-validation issue. OCSLD should be consulted for advice on good practice in teaching, learning and assessment where changes are to be made to these strategies. Programme teams should be aware that re-validation can have an impact on current students and applicants, and should seek advice on the timing of such an exercise from the Student Records and Curriculum Management (Registry) and Admissions teams.