Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
Donna Harp Ziegenfuss, Widener University, USA
Patricia A. Lawler, Widener University, USA
Session 3c, Tuesday 10.10
With a growing emphasis on student learning outcomes and assessment, faculty and educational developers seek out theory and research to inform not only classroom teaching and learning, but also course design methodologies. (Bowden, 1989; Diamond, 1997; Fink, 2003; Saroyan & Amundsen, 2004; Toohey, 1999). With the design and delivery of a new doctoral level course, Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, the researchers, a faculty and an instructional design specialist, were presented with a unique opportunity to examine the perceptions of faculty as they learned new course design methodologies in the role of student.
The research that began in 2004 demonstrated that the student perceptions about teaching, learning, and the process of course design differed dramatically from the perceptions of the faculty teaching the course, as well as other students, even though the students were teachers in higher education. Review of the traditional literature on best practices of teaching and learning and the educational development of teachers could not explain these findings. This led to a shift in the research focus away from trying to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the new course design, to concentrating on unearthing the different student experience variations and how these experiences were related to their dual roles as teacher and student, as well as their learning. The purpose of this phase of the research is focused on how participation in a course designed to improve teaching and learning shapes students’ perceptions of learning immediately following the course and over time. This widened the scope of the research and necessitated the inclusion of literature that we had not previously investigated from the UK, Australia and Sweden on phenomenography and the identification of variations in experiencing teaching and learning. Prosser (2000) states, “The overall aim [of phenomenographic research methodology] is to develop an understanding of the relations between the teacher’s and the student’s experiences of teaching and learning, with the eventual aim of improving the quality of student learning”.
Data collected from the continued correspondence between the researchers and the students after the course had ended demonstrated that the students needed to reflect and test their knowledge from this course in their own teaching before they could internalise and fully understand the significance of what they had learned. Teaching requires more than just knowledge or experience alone. “Development of any skill requires practice but that practice needs to be informed by critical reflection and theoretically informed instruction to suggest and demonstrate alternative approaches” (Beatty, 1998, p. 99).
During this research seminar, we will present our phenomenographic study, the one-year qualitative follow-up currently in progress. The third phase of our research seeks variations in the perceptions of the course environment and the relationship of student and teacher perceptions through surveys and interviews. This data will be used to improve future course design planning and implementation that will in turn improve student-learning outcomes and inform future educational development practice.