Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
David Gosling, University of Plymouth, UK
Andrew Hannan, University of Plymouth, UK
Session 4a, Tuesday 16.00
The establishment in 2005 of 74 Centres for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETLs) represents the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s (HEFCE's) largest ever single funding initiative designed to support the development of teaching and learning. The CETLs will get a total of £315 million over five years from 2005-06 to 2009-10. Each CETL will receive recurrent funding, ranging from £200,000 to £500,000 per annum for five years, and a capital sum ranging from £0.8 million to £2 million (HEFCE 2004). In 2006 additional funding will be allocated to some of the established CETLs and there are indications that there will be a second round of bidding.
This is a major initiative designed both to reward and promote excellence in teaching and learning across most of the higher education (HE) curriculum. It is also intended to form a counter-balance to the Research Assessment Exercise in giving institutions an incentive to prioritise teaching and learning. As such, it constitutes a fascinating case of an attempt to encourage innovation in HE.
This paper relates to a longitudinal research project, supported by the University of Plymouth, into the formation and development of the CETLs. The project is intended to examine the impact of the CETL initiative through all its stages, from first bids to implementation. In the first phase of the research (from January 2004) we have investigated how members of staff from different types of institutions came to understand the initiative, how they responded to its requirements, how the bidding process itself shaped the proposals, the individual and institutional effects of both failure and success in the bidding rounds and the way in which proposals have begun to be put into effect. We have been interviewing those involved (both bid-writers and senior managers) in over 20 CETL proposals from some 15 institutions. The findings from this first phase have been reported to SRHE (Hannan and Gosling 2005) and a journal article is in preparation.
This paper will present findings from the current stage of the project in which we are analysing the nature of the CETLs themselves, in terms of the kinds of activities they are undertaking. We are particularly interested in the theories that, explicitly or implicitly, are informing the approaches being adopted, in terms of the pedagogies and forms of curriculum they have been established to promote and the models of organisational change they invoke. It might be anticipated that, because each CETL is expected to undertake research relating to the main area of pedagogy in which excellence has been recognised, some clear theoretical frameworks would be identifiable. Some questions we will be addressing include:
Data are being gathered from various forms of documentation, including the bids themselves, descriptions in promotional literature and websites. We shall supplement this material with information from interviews with the academic directors of a sample of CETLs.