Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
Margaret Price, Berry O’Donovan Oxford Brookes University
Tuesday 4 September 2007, 16.00-17.00
Themes: Lifelong learning, Skills development
Teaching students to think critically is often cited as an aspiration of higher education and a fundamental skill that equips students for the long term. However, a common lament from academics involved in learning and teaching is the absence, or at least paucity, of a critical dimension in the assessed work of undergraduate students. The massification of higher education and the changing nature of today’s student are often blamed for this lack of criticality.
This seminar will explore one solution to this problem involving setting assessments that encourage students to think critically. As Gibbs suggests assessment systems drive student learning, and even when tutors say they want students to be critical and thoughtful, students often identify that what is really necessary is nothing more than rote learning (1992). The seminar will examine and discuss how assessment design can encourage critical thinking and explore some of the key issues including: multiple interpretations of criticality; the tacit nature of understandings of criticality and the consequent difficulty of sharing these between staff and students; whether criticality is a high level skill only appropriate for students engaged in advanced study.
The concept of criticality is examined and discussed in relation to Perry’s stages of student intellectual development (1970). We suggest that to encourage students to relinquish a dualistic and reproductive orientation to learning and move up the intellectual development ladder towards a relativist and critical approach requires an ‘unfreezing’ process (Lewin, 1951); assessment tasks that ‘problematise’ the subject (Grey et al, 1996); skills in information sourcing, evidencing and argument construction; and an assessment framework that stages assessment activity and allows for ‘slow learning’ (Claxton, 1998 cited in Knight and Yorke, 2002). For the last two years we have implemented such a framework with over 1,000 first year business undergraduates and initial findings will be discussed and shared with participants.