Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
6.2.1 The Conduct Officer shall carry out an initial investigation at their discretion but following the principles detailed in the Conduct Officers’ Handbook. Investigations may include interviews, gathering evidence, speaking to witnesses and preparing an investigation.
6.2.2 Depending on the circumstances they may decide to take one or more of the following actions:
220.127.116.11 Arrange an Interview with the student, or anyone relevant to the case. The Conduct Officer will write to the student, giving at least 5 working days’ notice of the interview
18.104.22.168 Decide there is no case to answer.
22.214.171.124 Decide to refer the case to the Standards of Conduct: Fitness to Practice Regulations
126.96.36.199 Give a fixed penalty as outlined in the Fixed Penalty Policy (Appendix B);
188.8.131.52 Refer the matter to be heard by the University Conduct Committee.
6.3.1 The exact arrangements will be organised by the Conduct Officer. All students will have the right to:
6.3.2 The Conduct Officer may be accompanied by a note-taker during the interview.
6.3.3 At the end of the conduct interview, the Conduct Officer will normally state the decision about breach of the regulations (if any), liability, and impose a penalty within the range delegated to them if applicable.
6.3.4 On occasion, the Conduct Officer may reconvene the interview, for example, where more information is required.
6.3.5 The Conduct Officer may give penalties appropriate to the breach up to and including 5.2.6. The maximum fine which a Conduct Officer can impose is £100 and the maximum period of unpaid community service is 10 hours.
6.3.6 The Conduct Officer may refer the case to a University Conduct Committee if they decide a breach of the regulations has been committed, but the penalty they feel is appropriate is not one which they are permitted to award (5.2.7 to 5.2.11).
6.3.7 The student will receive written confirmation of the decision, any penalty and an explanation of the appeal process where applicable, normally within 5 working days from the date of the Interview and within 25 working days of the referral to the Conduct Officer.
6.4.1 The University Conduct Committee will normally consist of the following:
184.108.40.206 A member of the Student Investigation and Resolution Team or nominee will act as Secretary to the Committee. A reported student will normally be given at least 10 working days’ notice of the committee date.
220.127.116.11 The University Conduct Committee will allow:
The Conduct Officer to:
The reported student to:
Members of the Committee to:
18.104.22.168 The University Conduct Committee will normally state the decision about breach of the regulations, liability and any penalty during the meeting.
22.214.171.124 On occasion, a decision may be taken to reconvene the committee, for example, where more information is required.
126.96.36.199 The University Conduct Committee may impose the full range of penalties.
188.8.131.52 The student will receive an outcome letter explaining the decision, penalty, next steps and information about making an appeal, if applicable, within 5 working days of the University Conduct Committee.
6.5.1 Where the reported student is:
found to be in minor breach of these regulations by the Conduct Officer and is dissatisfied with the outcome of a conduct interview, penalty or procedure;
found to be in breach of these regulations at the University Conduct Committee and is dissatisfied with the outcome, penalty or procedure;
they may request that their case is heard by a University Appeal Committee.
6.5.2 To initiate an Appeal Committee, the student must write to the Student Investigation and Resolution Team within 10 working days from the date of the Conduct Officer outcome letter, or the University Conduct Committee outcome letter, stating which aspect of the decision, penalty or process the reported student disagrees with and on which one (or more) of following grounds:
184.108.40.206 The student would like to present new evidence that they could not have reasonably produced before the University Conduct Committee;
220.127.116.11 There was a procedural irregularity;
18.104.22.168 The decision regarding liability was not fairly or reasonably made;
22.214.171.124 The penalty is unfairly disproportionate to the breach of regulations.
6.5.3 Evidence where appropriate, will be required.
6.5.4 The Student Investigation and Resolution Team may do one of the following:
6.5.5 The student will be informed of the decision within 10 working days.
6.5.6 A student who believes that the decision not to permit the student to go to an Appeal Committee is inappropriate may request that it be reviewed by the Academic Registrar or nominee.
6.5.7 A student who wishes to request a review by the Academic Registrar or nominee must write to the Student Investigation and Resolution Team, setting out the reasons why they believe the decision was inappropriate within 10 working days of the issue of the decision.
6.5.8 The Academic Registrar or nominee will review the decision and either uphold the decision or allow the student to proceed to a University Appeal Committee within 10 working days of receiving the request. If the Academic Registrar or nominee upholds the decision they will issue the student with a Completion of Procedures Letter.
6.6.1 The Appeal Committee membership will consist of:
6.6.2 Members of the Appeal Committee must be trained in these regulations. They must not have been involved with the case previously.
6.6.3 A member of the Student and Investigation and Resolution Team will normally act as Secretary to the committee.
6.6.4 The reported student and the Chair of the University Conduct Committee, or the investigating Conduct Officer have the right to attend.
6.6.5 Unless otherwise determined by the Chair of the Appeal Committee, the appeal shall take the form of a review of the decision of the University Conduct Committee or Conduct Officer. This means that the Appeal Committee shall normally only consider issues raised in the appeal by the reported student. The Committee will allow:
6.6.6 The Appeal Committee will normally state its decision as to whether to allow or dismiss the appeal at the hearing. The Appeal Committee may uphold the decision of the University Conduct Committee or the Conduct Officer, refer the case back to the University Conduct Committee or to a new Conduct Officer for a fresh hearing, or reach a different outcome and/or impose an alternative penalty.
6.6.7 The student will receive an outcome letter, explaining the decision and penalty and will be issued a Completion of Procedures letter.