Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Students section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
Camilla Chlebna is originally from Austria. She joined Oxford Brookes in 2013 as a research student in the Department of Planning. Her thesis title is 'The Role of Institutions for the Path-Dependent Development of the Wind Energy Industry in Germany and the United Kingdom'.
I came across Oxford Brookes University when looking for a Masters course in the UK. Brookes appeared to offer an attractive Masters programme in Spatial Planning with interesting options for specialisations. Also, one thing that really influenced my decision for Brookes was its beautiful motto “Excellence through diversity”. And this is truly alive, especially in the research community.
I was incredibly lucky in that my former dissertation supervisor and another lecturer that I had stayed in touch with asked me whether I was interested in doing a PHD. Of course this was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, which I could not turn down.
After completing my Masters I wanted to stay in the UK so ended up doing a variety of customer service roles, as this was what was easily available for a language speaker. I must say that I learned a lot about working in an office environment and about employment in large private sector companies.
I found it very easy to settle in. My work experience enabled me to carry the 9 to 5 attitude forward (adjusting it to something closer to 10 to 6). The research environment at Brookes is fantastic. The community is so supportive and all the extra courses etc that are available are amazing.
My research is concerned with the development of the wind energy industry in Germany and the United Kingdom. Despite having the best on and offshore wind resource in Europe the United Kingdom does not have a single large scale manufacturer of wind turbines. Germany overtook Denmark as world leader in turbine manufacturing in the early 1990s. This in part is down to the creation of a strong home market, which was enabled by the introduction of a feed-in tariff for decentralised sources of electricity in 1990. Only recently has the potential for offshore wind turbines been recognised in the United Kingdom and the industry is now trying to ‘catch up’ but are having to buy in key technology from elsewhere, notably Germany.
The study is placed within Evolutionary Economic Geography and uniquely combines the strands of the path dependency literature and neo-institutionalism. It puts forward the argument that technological development cannot be seen in isolation and must be understood as socially embedded activity. Therefore, institutions need to develop alongside technological innovation for the successful creation of new industries. It also argues that institutions carry a particular role in favouring or hindering the industrial development in a country or region because they determine the influence that the civil society and agents from the established industries are given in shaping its destiny. The institutions themselves are continually evaluated and recreated by society and are the outcome of struggles for influence between past agents.
To study this I have adapted a multi-level perspective of the path-dependent development of industries from existing literature. I have added the distinct focus on the role of institutions. The study presents and tests a framework to represent the dynamics between the civil society, the institutional arrangements and the economic landscape. The fieldwork consists of a descriptive, quantitative element and an explanatory, qualitative element. The quantitative element illustrates and describes whereas the qualitative element seeks to explain. Statistical data is collected, analysed and visualised. This is combined with the content analysis from around 30 semi-structured interviews. This will help to build explanation and will lead to an improved framework for understanding the role of institutions in the path dependent development of new industries.
Most of all I enjoy the freedom I have to organise my workload. There is also a lot of freedom to explore areas of interest. The relationship with my supervisor is great; I enjoy the difficult debates that we sometimes have and how my supervisor supports me but also pushes me to optimise all of my work.
Being a research student can be extremely challenging and we all experience phases where we feel we move backwards rather than forwards. As much as it can be painful I like this continuous challenge. When I experience my most stressful periods I intensify all my other activities as well - I like to go rowing, running, and swimming, meet my friends, and travel. This enables me to wind down and work harder when needed.
The training at Oxford Brookes is great. I have always found, even during my Masters course, that the quality of the teaching at Brookes is exceptional. Most of the research training ties in really well with what we need for our thesis. Equally good are the additional courses and events that the Graduate College offer. These have really helped me and boosted my confidence as a researcher.
I am quite open as to what to do next. I have not yet decided whether I want to pursue an academic career. I could also see myself working for a large company again or as member of a team of researchers in a private research institution.