Dr Max Morris
Senior Lecturer in Criminology
School of Law and Social Sciences
Role
Max joined Oxford Brookes as a Lecturer in Criminology in 2022. Before this, they were based in the Department of Criminology, Politics and Sociology at Kingston University. They completed their PhD in Sociology and Social Policy at Durham University in 2019.
Areas of expertise
- Gender
- Sexuality
- HIV
- Sex Work
- Social Media
- Queer Theory
Teaching and supervision
Modules taught
- Creating Criminology
- Media and Crime
- Public Criminology
- Green Criminology
- Sex that Offends
Max has been recognised as a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (FHEA) since 2020.
Supervision
Max welcomes PhD applications in the areas of gender and sexuality studies, with a focus on people living with HIV, LGBTQ+ people, sex work, social media, and queer theory.
Research
Max has published research on topics including the criminalisation of HIV, declining homophobia in educational settings, media representations of gender and sexual minorities, and incidental sex work in the digital age. They draw on creative methods and queer theory to understand the role of law and society in constructing identities.
Research group membership
- Critical Legal Perspectives on Society, Law, Gender, and Diversity (CLSGD).
Research grants and awards
- 'Incidental Sex Work: Casual and Commercial Encounters in Queer Digital Spaces' - Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
- 'Living Through Two Pandemics: The Experiences of HIV+ People during COVID-19' - Centre for Research in Communities, Identities and Difference (CResCID), Kingston University London.
- 'Not Sex Work: A Follow-up to the "Incidental Sex Work" Project' - Strategic Research Fund, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University.
- 'Speaker Series: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Sexuality, and Society' - Strategic Research Fund, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University.
Publications
Journal articles
-
Brooks-Gordon B, Morris, Sanders T, 'Harm reduction and decriminalization of sex work'
Sexuality Research and Social Policy 18 (2021) pp.809-818
ISSN: 1868-9884 eISSN: 1553-6610AbstractPublished hereIntroduction:
This special section of Sexuality Research and Social Policy, edited by Belinda Brooks-Gordon, Max Morris and Teela Sanders, has its origins in a colloquium sponsored by the University of Cambridge Socio-Legal Group in 2020. The goal was to promote the exchange of ideas between a variety of disciplinary research fields and applied perspectives on harm reduction and the decriminalization of sex work. The colloquium took place during the emergence of the coronavirus pandemic in February 2020.
Methods:
We explore the impact of Covid-19 on understandings of sex work, outline the basic underpinning legal philosophical question, explore the intersectional politics of decriminalization, summarize contemporary international health and human rights campaigns, explore contemporary public opinion trends on the issue, and illustrate the universal principles. Finally, we summarize the special section papers (N=12).
Results:
The Covid pandemic provided a lens through which to analyse the changes that have occurred in sex work and sex work research in the past decade and it also exacerbated intersecting inequalities, accelerated many social shifts already in motion whilst changing the course of others. In combination the papers in this special issue examine sex work policy and research across 12 countries in four continents to provide and important space for international and cross-cultural comparison.
Conclusions:
We present the timely contributions of diverse authors and comment on the significance of their research projects which support a decriminalization policy agenda for the benefit of academics, policymakers and practitioners to improve public health strategies and international responses.
Policy Implications:
The research here amplifies the focus on harm reduction and strengthens the case for public policy that decriminalizes commercial sex between consenting adults as the best strategy to reduce harm.
-
Morris M, 'The limits of labelling: Incidental Sex Work Among Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Young Men on Social Media'
Sexuality Research and Social Policy 18 (2021) pp.855-868
ISSN: 1868-9884 eISSN: 1553-6610AbstractPublished hereIntroduction
The term incidental sex work refers to forms of casual, occasional, unsolicited commercial sex, arranged between gay, bisexual, and queer men on social media platforms such as Grindr. This paper explores the limits of labelling sexual identities, and how definitions of “sex” and “work” have become increasingly unstable in the digital age.
Methods
This study used mixed methods, with the primary mode of data collection being qualitative interviews with young gay, bisexual, and queer men conducted between May 2015 and April 2016. The interviews incorporated a nine-point sexuality scale and photo-elicitation procedures to prompt further discussions. Through the participant recruitment process, the study also generated an informal survey of 1473 Grindr users aged 18 to 28, finding that 14.6% had been paid for sex, most of whom (8.2%) had done so “incidentally.”
Results
The 50 interview participants discussed being paid for sex 358 times. This paper focuses on their narratives of labelling, identity politics, sexual normativity, and social stigma. All participants distanced themselves from labels such as “prostitute,” “rent boy,” or “sex worker” given that their behaviours were not seen as “regular” or “professional” enough, alongside seeking to avoid association with stigmatising stereotypes of sex work. These results are compared with the participants’ experiences of coming out as gay, bisexual, and queer.
Discussion
These narratives are interpreted using queer theory to understand those whose behaviours and identities do not conform to normative (legal, medical, social) discourses of sex work. The implications of this hidden population for campaigners, policymakers, and healthcare practitioners are discussed, contributing to ongoing debates around harm reduction and social policy.
-
Morris M, 'The politics of testing positive'
Culture, Health & Sexuality 23 (11) (2021) pp.1485-1499
ISSN: 1369-1058 eISSN: 1464-5351AbstractPublished hereThis paper draws on an autoethnographic ‘digital diary’ which the author began after testing positive for HIV in July 2016, until May 2021, to critically assess (mis)representations of both the AIDS and COVID-19 pandemics in the media. Drawing on insights from art, literature, queer theory and social anthropology, the paper focuses on dominant moral and political discourses to show how narratives of blame, shame and guilt about viral transmission contribute to the stigmatisation of ‘at risk’ groups. Concepts of biopower and normative judgement are used to reflect on discourses which construct those who ‘test positive’ for HIV or SARS-CoV-2 as ‘reckless’, ‘risky’ or ‘irresponsible’ subjects. The paper also analyses notes on recent media appearances made by the author to discuss their participation in the PARTNER study, which showed that HIV antiretroviral therapy eliminates the possibility of HIV transmission, including reports in The Guardian, on BBC News, on Sky News, on Channel 5 News, and in the Metro. As the former had reported that the ‘Covid-19 crisis raises hopes of end to UK transmission of HIV’, portrayals of the two pandemics are compared to explore tensions between public health and individual responsibility as normative priorities.
-
Ashford C, Morris M, Powell A, 'Bareback sex in the age of preventative medication: Rethinking the "harms" of HIV transmission'
The Journal of Criminal Law 84 (6) (2020) pp.596-614
ISSN: 0022-0183 eISSN: 1740-5580AbstractPublished here Open Access on RADARThe experiences of People living with HIV have been transformed over recent years. Advances in medical science have made the virus a manageable chronic condition, while eliminating the risk of onward transmission for those with access to treatment, something referred to as TasP (treatment as prevention) or U=U (undetectable equals untransmissible). More recently, the availability of PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), alongside PEP (post-exposure prophylaxis), through the NHS has created the conditions for condomless sexual encounters to take place without the fear of HIV transmission associated with previous decades. Despite this, the criminal law has continued to frame HIV in terms of personal responsibility and bodily autonomy within the dominant narratives of danger, disease, and out-dated science. Doctrinal law has failed to keep pace with social and scientific change. Therefore, in this article, we provide a re-examination of the criminal issues relating to HIV transmission within this new landscape, arguing that it necessitates a shift in attitude, policy and doctrine. We specifically argue that HIV transmission does not meet the appropriate harm threshold to constitute GBH and that if criminal law is ultimately about preventing or regulating harm, the ongoing criminalisation of HIV transmission is counter to that aim.
-
Morris M, '“Gay capital” in gay student friendship networks'
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 35 (9) (2017) pp.1183-1204
ISSN: 0265-4075 eISSN: 1460-3608AbstractPublished hereThis article draws on qualitative interviews with 40 gay male undergraduates at four universities across England to explore the dynamics of participants’ friendship networks in the context of decreased homophobia. Describing their schools and universities as gay-friendly spaces, most participants developed close friendships with both straight and sexual minority peers in spontaneous ways, away from institutional venues such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender student societies. Building on Bourdieu’s conceptualization of the symbolic economy of class, I introduce a new concept to understand how having a visible gay identity can act as a form of privilege in inclusive, post-gay social fields: gay capital. Through shared knowledge of gay cultures, belonging to gay social networks, and having one’s gay identity recognized as a form of prestige, gay capital supplements cultural, social, and symbolic forms of capital. These findings trouble traditional generalizations of gay youth as victimized due to their sexual minority status. However, finding that participants’ experiences differed across the four research settings, this article also develops an intersectional analysis by highlighting that access to gay capital is limited by other forms of class, gender, and sexual hierarchy.
-
McCormack M, Wignall L, Morris M, 'Gay guys using gay language'
The British Journal of Sociology 67 (4) (2016) pp.747-767
ISSN: 0007-1315 eISSN: 1468-4446AbstractPublished hereThis article draws on in-depth interviews with 35 openly gay male undergraduates from four universities in England to develop an understanding of the changing nature of language related to homosexuality. In addition to finding a diminution in the prevalence of homophobic language, we demonstrate that participants maintain complex and nuanced understandings of phrases that do not use homophobic pejoratives, such as ‘that's so gay’. The majority of participants rejected the notion that these phrases are inherently homophobic, instead arguing that the intent with which they are said and the context in which they are used are vital in understanding their meaning and effect. We conceptualize an intent-context-effect matrix to understand the interdependency of these variables. Highlighting the situated nature of this matrix, we also demonstrate the importance of the existence of shared norms between those saying and hearing the phrase when interpreting such language.
-
Morris M, Anderson E, '"Charlie Is So Cool Like": Authenticity, Popularity and Inclusive Masculinity on YouTube'
Sociology 49 (6) (2015) pp.1200-1217
ISSN: 0038-0385 eISSN: 1469-8684AbstractPublished hereOn the world’s most utilised video-sharing social networking site, YouTube, Charlie McDonnell (Charlieissocoollike), Dan Howell (Danisnotonfire) and Jack and Finn Harries (JacksGap) are Britain’s most popular video-bloggers (vloggers). With more than two million regular subscribers to each of their channels, along with millions of casual viewers, they represent a new form of authentic online celebrity. These young men, whose YouTube careers began as teenagers, do not espouse a traditional form of masculinity; they are not sporty, macho or even expressly concerned with being perceived as heterosexual. Instead, they present a softer masculinity, eschewing the homophobia, misogyny and aggression attributed to boys of previous generations. These behaviours are theorised using Anderson’s Inclusive Masculinity Theory. Drawing on analysis of 115 video-blogs (vlogs), along with an in-depth interview with Charlie McDonnell, this article examines how these young men developed and exhibit their inclusive masculinities and attitudes, which we postulate are a reflection of dominant youth culture.
-
Morris M, McCormack M, Anderson E, 'The changing experiences of bisexual male adolescents'
Gender and Education 26 (4) (2014) pp.397-413
ISSN: 0954-0253 eISSN: 1360-0516AbstractPublished hereDrawing on in-depth interviews with 15 openly bisexual male youth from sixth forms across the UK, this article documents positive experiences of bisexual male youth in school: participants had positive coming out experiences and did not encounter significant discrimination or harassment because of their sexual identity. Participants attribute this to the inclusive environments of their schools and local cultures. Examining the narratives of two participants who had negative experiences, this article also highlights continued issues for bisexual youth in schools. It thus advances our understanding of contemporary bisexual lives in educational institutions, and contributes to debates about whether sixth forms are more inclusive spaces than secondary schools for bisexuals.
Book chapters
-
Morris M, 'How to survive another plague: Autoethnographic reflections on antiviral medication, cultural memory, and dystopian metaphor' in Jaime García-Iglesias, Maurice Nagington, and Peter Aggleton (ed.), Viral Times: Reflections on the COVID-19 and HIV Pandemics, Routledge (2024)
ISBN: 9781032345567 eISBN: 9781003322788AbstractPublished here Open Access on RADARDrawing inspiration from David France’s documentary and book How to Survive a Plague, which detailed the initial responses of activists and scientists to AIDS, this chapter reflects on the role of cultural memories and dystopian metaphors in making sense of viral pandemics. As an autoethnographer, the chapter is informed by my experiences of living with HIV, alongside other conditions which classified me as ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ to COVID-19. Contributing to this edited collection’s themes, I turn to Foucault’s writings on ‘the plague’ to critique dominant discourses and metaphors which tend to marginalise, minoritise and moralise people for viral transmission, alongside Butler’s concept of grievability, to question the logics by which some lives were constructed as less valuable, or even blameworthy, in response to both viruses. Finally, I provide a critique of neoliberal and modernist ideologies which have tended to allocate resources (including antiviral research and treatment) in an emotionally detached, dehumanising, and bureaucratic manner. Having drawn on literary tropes found in the horror genre more generally to make sense of the response to COVID-19 and HIV elsewhere, this chapter examines dystopian metaphors as fictional devices which can be used to understand these viral times as dystopian times.
Reviews
-
Morris M, review of Contemporary Masculinities in the UK and the US: Between Bodies and Systems
Men and Masculinities 23 (2) (2019) pp.398-400
ISSN: 1097-184X eISSN: 1552-6828Published here -
Morris M, review of Porno? Chic! How Pornography Changed the World and Made it a Better Place, by Brian McNair
Sexualities 18 (4) (2015) pp.519-520
ISSN: 1363-4607 eISSN: 1461-7382Published here -
Morris M, review of Touching encounters: sex, work, & male-for-male internet escorting, by Kevin Walby, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2012, 232 pp., US$25.00 (paperback), ISBN: 9780226870069
Psychology and Sexuality 5 (4) (2013) pp.378-380
ISSN: 1941-9899 eISSN: 1941-9902Published here
Other publications
-
Morris, M, 'Homophobia', (2019)
AbstractPublished hereThe mistreatment of sexual minorities has been a feature of criminal justice systems around the world throughout the twentieth century. The culturally produced hatred of homosexuals, known as homophobia, was used to discriminate against not only lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, but gender nonconforming heterosexuals as well. In the United States, this discrimination was often justified by media representations and research literature made available to prison administrators, which framed same-sex relationships as pathological, immoral, and damaging to the institutional order. Early gay liberation movements sought to challenge such homophobic attitudes in solidarity with prisoners up until the HIV/AIDS epidemic of the 1980s. Intersectional scholarship has also drawn attention to the problems experienced by transgender women and women of color in the prison system and how this continues to be reinforced by homophobia.
-
Morris M, 'Incidental sex work', (2018)
AbstractPublished hereThis thesis provides an overview of the first empirical study of ‘incidental sex work’, a form of casual, occasional, unplanned commercial sex arranged on digital media platforms. Rather than advertising, the (50) young sexual minority men I interviewed agreed to sell sex after being propositioned by (125) older men on social networking sites and smartphone apps. Alongside qualitative interviews including photo-elicitation procedures, a survey of 1,473 Grindr users aged 18 to 28, from major cities across England and Wales, found that at least 14.6% had been paid for sex (8.2% incidentally). Interview participants had diverse experiences of acceptance and discrimination in their coming out narratives, sexual experiences, and social networks. Incidental sex work encounters involved a range of behaviours, including ‘vanilla’ and ‘kinky’ sex acts, forms of emotional labour, and webcamming. In most cases, participants framed their paid sexual experiences as comparable to unpaid sexual experiences. Economic motivations included low or insecure incomes, student debts, and the ability to consume (both ‘essential’ and ‘consumer’) goods and services, while sexual motivations included ‘boredom’, ‘desire’, ‘experimentation’, ‘opportunity’, and ‘thrill’. Almost all of the participants distanced themselves from conventional labels such as ‘escort’, ‘rent boy’ or ‘sex worker’, suggesting that their behaviours were not ‘regular’ or ‘professional’ enough to count, alongside a desire to avoid association with stigmatising stereotypes of sex work as criminal, immoral, and pathological. Most incorrectly believed that their behaviours were illegal, but also argued that state interventions would be ‘pointless’, ‘harmful’, or ‘impossible’. Highlighting historical and contemporary associations between sexual minorities (principally men who have sex with men and women who sell sex), this thesis draws on postmodern theories of class, gender, and sexuality to suggest that the boundaries between casual and commercial sex have become blurred by changing social attitudes and the proliferation of internet technologies, complicating the ubiquity of discourses of despair, sexual identity politics, and regulatory policy approaches.
-
Morris M, Anderson E, 'Homophobia', (2017)
AbstractPublished hereThe term homophobia was coined in the late 1960s by clinical psychologist George Weinberg and popularized in his book, Society and the Healthy Homosexual (1972). Although the suffix phobia generally refers to an irrational fear, homophobia today refers to the culturally produced attitudinal disposition ranging from mild dislike to abhorrence of people who are sexually or romantically attracted to individuals of the same sex. Homophobia has manifested itself in a variety of ways in the United States, from legal, institutional discrimination to personal acts of intimidation and violence.
Professional information
Memberships of professional bodies
- Sex Work Research Hub (Board Member)