Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
Sue Fostaty Young, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
Themes: learning and teaching methods, assessment, learning environments, supporting learners
With ever increasing rates of success, university faculty members are rising to the challenge of creating and implementing innovative teaching strategies meant to provide their students with opportunities to engage in critical thinking, and creative problem solving on their way to deep, meaningful learning. Despite those innovations, students are still most likely to make choices regarding what and how to study based on the assessment model in place (e.g. Ames, 1992; Boud, 1990; Wilcox, 1993), not on how they were taught.
Because students often regard grades as “a kind of currency indicating what teachers value” (Boud, 1990, p103), the influence of them often swamps the effects of any other aspect of the curriculum, including instruction (Wilcox, 1993, p. 7). Now, a pressing challenge for university faculty members is to find and implement a method of assessment that reflects and supports valued learning processes and deep learning as well as it does desired content outcomes.
This paper outlines the ICE model of qualitative learning assessment (Wilson, 1996; Fostaty Young & Wilson, 2000), it’s implications, successes and limitations for use in higher education, and illustrates its utility through current-use examples.
ICE, an acronym for Ideas, Connections and Extensions, is based on a cognitive development theory of learning similar to that put forth by Biggs’ and Collis’ SOLO taxonomy (1982), and describes learning as a process of growth from novice toward expert. The simplicity and utility of the model makes it relatively easy for faculty to articulate expectations for learning and even to describe what demonstrations of learning might look like at each of the three levels. ICE provides students with a blueprint for learning so they become better able to plan for their own improvement and, in short time, to engage in self-directed learning and effective self-assessment. Practical examples from several disciplines will be discussed.