Go to the Students section
Go to the Staff section
Go to the Alumni section
Go to the Study here section
Go to the International section
Go to the About section
Go to the Research section
Go to the Business and Employers section
Go to the Support us section
Themes: teaching methods, course and programme design, faculty development methods and/or strategies
Tuesday 8 September 2009, 10.10 - 11.10 in room G61
This seminar explores the undergraduate research experiences of second year science students at an Australian research intensive university through evidence gathered from survey, interview and narrative techniques. The pilot study uses a previously tested instrument adapted from the University of Colorado (Seymour et al, 2004) and forms part of a larger scale focus on undergraduate research activities across the university.
It has been established that authentic undergraduate research experiences in science play an important role in providing context to student learning and providing a sense of what it means to be a 'scientist' (Boyer, 1998). There has been, however, some concern over the validity of the claims made relating to the extent of the impact that research experiences have on undergraduate students. Recent literature indicates that many authors are now concentrating on establishing credible instruments for assessing (Seymour etal 2004) and even measuring (Lopatto, 2004) the extent of the impact of research experiences.
At The University of Queensland (UQ) there exists an array of programs and student-centred activities aimed at creating a strong link between undergraduates and the research culture which exists at UQ. The diversity of opportunities for students to engage in research at different levels, and to different extents, is often driven by discipline-specific differences and also by the level of experience of the student and the teacher. This is a widely recognised model for diversity within research experiences (Healey, 2005). However at UQ there has been little emphasis on the development of evaluation tools, or a focus on the need to provide evidence, to support the further development or expansion of undergraduate research experiences in science. Furthermore, there has been little growth in staff development activities to promote or expand the occurrence of quality research experiences for undergraduates.
This pilot study focussed on the summer research experience of second year students in an undergraduate science course which involved independent research in a laboratory environment for 8-10 weeks. The study investigated student perceptions of the benefits they gained from the research experience they undertook. The study, which is still underway, will also investigate which benefits are still perceived by students almost a year after the experience, and if the experience influences student career plans.
The study looked in detail at which experiences (positive and negative) occurred; at the frequency, similarities and differences of these experiences; looked at characteristics of the most ‘beneficial’ experiences; and investigated ‘student-identified benefits’ in a comparison to the Seymour etal study (2004) at University of Colorado at Boulder.
In addition to the Seymour instrument and methodology, this study supplemented the investigation using narrative techniques to collect student stories. Narrative techniques are open ended in a way that surveys and structured interviews are not (Rixon, 2008). This combination of techniques produced rich data and provided a broad picture of student experiences.
This seminar will build strongly on the conference themes of course and programme design and teaching methods, as well as promoting discussion on the theme of faculty development. In this seminar we will report on the data gathered in early 2009 and the first stage in our analysis, and lead discussion in three major areas: